On Reading a ‘New Release’ Book

February 6th, 2010

You may have noticed from my discussions that I don’t read much modern literature. I think Palahniuk’s Fight Club and Choke might be the only works of narrative prose (i.e. – fiction or creative nonfiction) published within the last 25 years on my bookshelf at home. (Correction: I also have Nick Horby’s novel High Fidelity, Jon Krakauer’s nonfiction work Into The Wild, Tao Lin’s short story collection Bed, and one or two others.) There are a few reasons for this. First, I’ve been trying to catch up on many of the “classics” that I missed out on while skirting the reading requirements in high school English classes. More often than not, I managed to patch together a project without reading the entire book — and N64’s “Goldeneye” seemed much more important at the time.

The second reason is more complex, but it relates to my skepticism over the value of contemporary publishing. I’m sure there’s a long catalog of works that try to explain the reasons for the degraded efficacy of modern literature: people watch too much TV and movies, play too many video games, aren’t educated enough, or are tasteless, unrefined cretins. That’s without even mentioning the publishing industry’s concerns over lagging profits. Of course, the assumption there is that the publishers deserved whatever success they had enjoyed up until recent times.

Click to continue reading “On Reading a ‘New Release’ Book”

The Flawed Art of Literary Rejection

January 20th, 2010

In early December 2009 I submitted my lengthy essay “Indecision Over Michigan” to the Cooperative Press, a branch of the group Michigan Writers that helps emerging writers publish a chapbook in the literary genre of their choice. It’s a program intended to educate new writers on the entire publication process. As it says on their website, “Selected authors share the publishing costs and marketing responsibilities with Michigan Writers in return for the prestige of being published by a press that prints only carefully selected manuscripts.”

I thought it sounded like a great idea, and I was totally willing to foot the $250 for the actual printing of the books. I even rushed to cut my essay down from almost 12,000 to just under 10,000 words, to stay within their submission guidelines. I printed and mailed the literary spawn, and I waited patiently. Then on Sunday night I got an email notification that my essay was rejected. They received 14 submissions and had picked three for publication.

Click to continue reading “The Flawed Art of Literary Rejection”

A Reminder of Why I Made Supraterranean

January 13th, 2009

This week while searching for freelance work, I happened to find the web site for Poets & Writers Magazine, the self-proclaimed “primary source of information, support, and guidance for creative writers.” Their home page currently features an article called “Agents and Editors: A Q&A With Four Young Literary Agents.” It’s essentially a five-page interview arranged by Grove/Atlantic editor Jofie Ferrari-Adler, except with some twists thrown in. Ferrari-Adler asked herself an important question before starting: “Wouldn’t it be more valuable to writers if I could get a few drinks in them first?” The answer is, indubitably, YES!

I started reading the article to better understand the role of literary agents and the publishing industry as a whole. What the article actually did was reaffirm some of the reasons why I created Supraterranean.com in the first place. The world of publishing has become a giant corporate mess, but that happened long before I was born. However, now consolidation of publishers is making things even worse. Just as in the music industry, the books you see in big stores and atop bestseller lists are certainly not the best ones being written; they’re simply the ones that can be sold the most effectively to a specific type of market. Hence, as it is with music, the world of popular books is monotonous and dismal.

This conversation between four young literary agents is funny at times, but more often frustrating. All these agents are in denial of the imminent demise of the traditional paper book publishing industry. Not once throughout the conversation do they discuss literature as an art form, or the greater role of literary fiction in society. It’s all about markets and commercial products, not experimentation and progress. I’m sure that paper books will be around in some form at all times, but this method of turning fiction into a mass product will not last. Between electronic (both online and off) and on-demand book publishing, I think new systems will arise that will complete the destruction  of the major book companies.

Then we can have a free flow of literary development, where writers control their own evolution as artists. The public will benefit in the same way they did from the recent overturn in the world of music. The floodgates will open and we’ll all swim in the luminescence of creativity and passion.

In the meantime, we have this Q&A. Jeff Kleinman was the only one who seemed aware of the ridiculous nature of the book industry, but all four of them are dead-set in their ways. Instead of working my favorite quotes into a commentary, I think they can stand on their own. The full interview probably spanned about 10,000 words, so this serves as a decent digest for anyone short on time. But if this isn’t enough, please consult the actual article.

ON AGENTS: “I think the problem is that we’re all sheep. I think we’re all coming from the same complex. We’re all either in New York or affiliated with New York and have the same kind of vision because ‘this is the stuff that sells.’ I think there’s a uniformity.” -Kleinman

“I think so much of this business is egotistical agents who make writers wait.” -Kleinman

ON CLIENTS: “I think an ideal client is somebody who is obviously an incredibly gifted writer who also understands that, these days, being a writer is more than just writing a book. A writer who is willing to participate in the publication. Brainstorming. Working with their publicist. Working with their marketing department. Getting themselves out there. Using their connections. It’s hard because I think a lot of writers happen to be introverts who are shy and kind of just want to be left alone to sit at their desks in solitude. I think it’s somewhat unfair that the business has changed so much and that we now rely on them. But we do. And, truthfully, the writers who are the most successful sometimes are the ones who are really willing to be a part of the business aspect of it.” -Barer

“I think it’s not just the author who’s really well connected—it’s the author who’s so well connected that he’s sleeping with a producer at ABC News or something.” -Kleinman

“You’ve got to be on your best behavior, even if you’re in a crappy mood. Always write thank-you notes. Help other writers. I have another client who’s like that too. So aside from being smart and writing something really terrific, I think you have to have people rooting for you.” -Zuckerbrot

“I don’t want to hear that you’re mired in the classics. The classics are great. They’re an amazing foundation to have. But if you are not reading what is being published today, and what is selling, who are you writing for?” -Zuckerbrot

“I think there’s so much MFA stuff with such a standard voice and such a standard protocol.” -Kleinman [note: MFA = Masters of Fine Arts]

ON EDITORS: “I’m convinced that if you have a choice between an editor who is a great editor—who really understands fiction, how it works, how to shape it—versus an editor who is a cheerleader, I will always, from now on and forever afterward, take the cheerleader. For a long time I kept thinking, ‘It’s so important to have an editor who can shape the book.’ I was such a moron. ” -Kleinman

“I will not send [an author's book] out until it is perfect to me, and then it will be edited again by your editor. But it will have a chance at actually selling.” -Barer

ON THE INDUSTRY: “If you’re a writer and you want to be published, go out and buy a hardcover debut novel and short-story collection tomorrow. And next month, do it again. Buy one every freaking month. Because if you want to be published and you want people to buy your books, and you are not out there supporting fiction and debut authors, you are the biggest hypocrite in the world and I don’t know who you think you are.” -Barer

“I read [the New York Magazine article entitled "The End"] and couldn’t decide if I should buy up every issue I could get my hands on and throw them off the top of the HarperCollins building, or if I should throw myself off and make it faster. But I talked to Amy Berkower and Al Zuckerman and Robin Rue, who have been in this business for a lot longer than I have, and they all said, ‘We read that same article every single year.’” -Lazar

“The books that don’t work these days are those wonderful little books that I loved in the eighties—those very quiet, introspective, interior, family coming-of-age books. I loved those books. But they just don’t work anymore.” -Barer


    Bookmark and Share
    About

    Re•frac•tor n. 1) A telescope that uses a lens to bring light to a focus at the end of a long tube. 2) A person that refracts // Supraterranean.com is a new kind of online magazine where writers, filmmakers, and artists can self-publish their creative work, including fiction, nonfiction, essays, poetry, short films, photography, art, and multimedia.

    This is the corresponding blog run by creator and administrator Nick Meador, covering literature, film, culture, technology, and other relevant topics. Nick received an MA in Journalism from MSU in 2008. His website is nickmeador.org.

    rss feed Refractor Blog
    rss feed Nick's Creative Work
    Links